Written Off Debts
By Brig. (r) Junaid Zaman • May 17th, 2008 • Category: Politics, Worth A Second Look • (3,001 views) • 2 CommentsJustice M. Nawaz Abbasi, Justice Mian Hamid Farooq and Justice M. Farrukh Mahmud followed footprints of Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhary for an instance, when they took suo motu action on the SBP’s approval of a ‘loan writte-off loan scheme’ to quietly write off Rs54.6 billion loans taken from different commercial banks, in last three years.
Rs. 54.6 billions? One hell of an amount. This is an amount which could feed billions in the country, and which could light up millions of homes, and which could educate millions of children. But that was blessed by the previous regime to just to hold on to the power.
A whooping total of 50,427 people, including politicians, civil and military business concerns and business tycoons of Karachi, Lahore and other cities had been blessed through the scheme.
Musharraf has paid a heavy price to stick to the power, but this price was not paid from his own pocket, but from the empty stomachs, dark houses and shattered hopes of hapless people of this unfortunate country.
Last 5 posts by Brig. (r) Junaid Zaman
- Drones in Bannu, More Near to Pakistani Nuclear Assets - November 19th, 2008
- Obama For Osama - November 13th, 2008
- Sinister Situation in Swat - November 9th, 2008
- Tough Afghans, Soft Americans - November 8th, 2008
- Battlefield FATA - November 6th, 2008
Trackback URL
|
|
|
Brig. (r) Junaid Zaman
Servicing the nation in new uniform.
Email this author | All posts by Brig. (r) Junaid Zaman
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.



























May 17th, 2008
Required Reply from Pro Musharraf Group. Please don’t start giving excuses like from 1988 to 1999… As you always claims that Mushi did best and concurred this country for good governance ( Although from Lattas and bloody retired Amry generals). and helping poor people…. Then what is this…
May 17th, 2008
Dear Sir, very nicely presented pro bono publico, questionnaire but again slight directional deviation, which will once again derange and shatter the confidence of people.
You see sir, reliance without knowing the design of system and its mover are the basics, due to which we as people are at the peak of suffering.
Approach to confidence and reliability should always be matched against traditional attitude and profile with back up knowledge to the credibility of individual.
Sir, self assumptions with tagging the individual as credible can not be perceived by simple inquire and proclamation that action will be conducted.
Taking suo moto action against query can not simply be taken as decision.
The need is that effective action at termination of the arrest of the culprit till the matter is decided is the base issue that is the need of time.
However this has been the tradition of our system in judiciary that sentence of notices to the extent of respondent are always issued as order of the day but thereafter the system is further governed and monitored as per requisite desire of the government and their motives.
You see we got to perceive things now and onward in the light of our or any bodies background profile, and its appointment whether, the same was on merit based or it was a selection.
In my opinion present judicial system and of course the previous successors were appointed on similar protocol of government wishes and desire and these judges at present or the past are similar siblings in the contest of qualification and credibility .
This can be reassessed by present waived off policy of judiciary to clear all evils of the charges that were put previously and setting aside liabilities as to their oath, whenever they are put to stress by government.
This case like previous will again be the matter of dust and dumb like all time attitude , however few extraordinary actions that has no effects as regard to fate or curtailment will be seen after few days of initial notices .my regards .