Who to be held responsible?

Social crimes are controlled by the enforcing agencies, external aggression by the arm forces, and similarly things are managed by mutual activity of the different classes and specialty of community in the form of relief, pay emoluments, sacrifice, services and as per required circumstances and personnel desires and motives, thus managing each other issues ,considering self respect.

The responsibility of smooth system has always been the responsibility of government.

What ever are the circumstances and issue of the public, the share of the responsibility is always the loyal role of elected government.

The government, with the method and mode’s to fulfill the required desire of the people in the form and format of relief appreciably control and console their people, like a mother who looks after her children.

Failure to achieve and follow requirement reflects incapacity or in eligibility.

No excuses to the ill action are accepted.

If a criminal s, escapes through the way, search is the responsibility to be skill fully done so to monitor recovery by engineered expertise.

But astonishingly, the run away bride has never come in to discussion although Shaukat Aziz was the prime suspect and tailored successor.

My point of discussion is what are the factors that are hindering these policy makers to curtail their discussion with the role and recovery of Mr. Shaukat Aziz?

Why demand to handover the suspect that has created such a mess to the nation has not gained and escapes the accountability.

In my opinion it’s a deliberate lapse of duty, being in conductivity so to initiate and ignite the people to the state of desire at which such aids and relief becomes the willful act of the population.