Comments on: Musharraf is Here to Stay

By: Amber Ghaffar

Amber Ghaffar — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:13:13 +0000

my previous reply was in response to Aftab .S.Alam s comment no.11….

why there is no one discussing on this so called IMPARTIAL media …….that if president is unconstitutional ,then what about the elections he did……..what about the people who took oat from him …………..including fed.ministers of ppp and pml n ………and lastly what about MR prime minister…………………………….if president is unconstitutional then his all acts become unconstitutional ….including this so called PEOPLE S VERDICT election…and govt…

(i can t dare to copy ALTAF HUSSAIN………………..THE point is this thing raised in my thoughts before during discussion some where else too,and again after listening ALTAF s comments i recalled and want to endorse it )

By: Amber Ghaffar

Amber Ghaffar — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:06:20 +0000

though i am not the right person to answer ..but what i just gotta know is

1st answer of 2nd question…i just heard from hafeez peerzada that SUPREME COURT can only intervene before starting of movement in parliament and if movement started in parliament ,then parliament can no more intervene …………………….

1st question s answer ,,,,,,,KAMran khan ,javed chowdery they are the one ,who are indicating signs of army action …and formation of technocrats govt.in pak.if some bad happens …
…rest ALLAH knows better …

By: Chotta Bao

Chotta Bao — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:59:12 +0000

Dr. Raza, Aftab Aslam, Amber, Khurram.

Mr. President

We are waiting for out come, Lets wait till tomarrow, for little better understanding of this situation.
Now it’s clear, that President Musharraf, is an honest man. He trusted and let these corrupt politician back in Politics of Pakistan. A snake will bite, and poison you, by nature, no matter how well you behave. I am surprised, The President and his team was so ignorant. In my view The most serious crime will go dawn in history against President Musharraf, to leave Pakistan behined in hands of criminals knowingly, if he failed to protect himself, against impeachment. Shame on you Mr. President.

Mr. President it’s your duty to save Pakistan. How you should know better. I am watching You !!

By: Aftab S. Alam

Aftab S. Alam — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:07:50 +0000

Bhai, anyone who is willing to share his wealth with me (knowing your generousity, I am almost certain you will oblige!)

By: Dr Razahaider

Dr Razahaider — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:56:16 +0000

Dear, is it general floats for every one or you intend to get opinion through desired individual.

By: Aftab S. Alam

Aftab S. Alam — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:46:38 +0000

Let me ask something else:

What, if ?

1) The President decides to pre-empt the intentions of his adversaries (actually enemies!) and dissolve just the National Assembly.

2) The Spreme Court of Pakistan decides to intervene either pro bono or an appeal / writ a petition and a long legal wrestling ensues.

By: Dr Razahaider

Dr Razahaider — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:59:42 +0000

Aftab ,there is nothing in this world which is beyond the understanding of human being and people with your profile ,when not interested to comment do show such impression of ignorance or lack of awareness deliberately .

However although there is, a little expression of taunt but nevertheless, some people have rights to repel or repeal.

No procedure, as system is different from the other.

Basics always remain the same.

Out of 25 students in class 5 can be absent due to exigency emergency, ill effects or personnel engagement less, death.

Total composition always remains the same till some one quit school.

Electoral houses have similar legislated rule of register and attendance as roll.

Being a legislative authority and supreme house with scattered representation, weightage of the individual is deliberately segregated and personalized.

You are right to the extent that, it is considered a protest vote opposing the ‘motion’ and is part of the total.

Mustafa, 2/3rd majority means total existing seats regardless of absentees. But , excluding seats that have not been occupied as electoral selections,death.

By: Amber Ghaffar

Amber Ghaffar — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:45:18 +0000

this some thing is big question mark for me either ..

By: Amber Ghaffar

Amber Ghaffar — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:43:19 +0000

AFTAB saying right ,abstentions during impeachment is taken as opposing ,this is i heard from lawmakers from several t.v talk shows.
..
i don’t believe that Amin fahim has such power in party ,he is out of power game his only hope is friendship with Pervaiz Mush.
this is worst time for MQM (3 me na 13 me ) they might be praying that p.mush resign himself before going to impeachment…
..p.mush only hope from Punjab i.e pml q is not even supporting him completely ,look at fwd.groups in senate and NA,they are gonna definitely either refraining from voting or casting against P.mush…..
Ms kashmala tariq is in Malaysia for conference ..(she could stay there more due to some illness like flu …) ..her other members would refrain perhaps.
In full sense ,if any such movement present in Parliament then it would be successful…
..i ,like Sheikh Rasheed and Nilofer Bakhtiar ,believe some thing will happen before impeachment move ……

By: Aftab S. Alam

Aftab S. Alam — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:29:41 +0000

Mustafa, what you heard about Jameel-uz- Zaman, if it is true, sounds bad to my ears.

I think it is clearly stipulated in Rules about the status of Abstentions. I think it is considered a protest vote opposing the ‘motion’ and is part of the total. However, I am not sure. You know what, Doctor Raza Haider Sahib can check this out and help us understand this circumstance.