India’s struggle to get Non-permanent seat in the UNSC
By Afshain Afzal • Nov 16th, 2009 • Category: Features • 4 CommentsPolitical statements coming from the office of Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh are not very encouraging. Analysts have started a renewed debate on the future of Jammu & Kashmir state and seriously ponder if Kashmir is not an issue at all and mere related to Kashmiris’ grievance regarding governance and development. In fact India wants to stick to its stubborn position that any talks had to be within the Constitution. If we recall, Indian Prime Minister Vajpayee took a historic bus ride to Minar-e-Pakistan in 1999 but that was sabotaged by powerful pressure group because they knew that India is not going to change its position. Then there was Kargil conflict which ended in sheer wastage of time and energies. The year 2002 witnessed Indian Parliament attacks followed by mobilization of Indian troops along Indo-Pak border by Vajpayee. Finally there were Mumbai attacks of November 2008, which parallelized the talks on Kashmir issue between the two countries. One wonders, what is the real motive behind the so called talks between the two countries? Governments in India and Pakistan had been fooling their nationals, the Kashmiris as well as world at large.
For so many years India had been bluffing the world that they are serious in holding discussions with Pakistan on the issue of Kashmir. All of a sudden India came up with a new idea that breakthroughs in United Nations Security Council (UNSC) platform in the shape of Resolutions on Kashmir have lost their significance after Simla Agreement between Pakistan and India, claiming that onwards all issues will be solved bilaterally. In this way over two and a half decades were wasted. On the Pakistani side, General (Retired) Pervez Musharraf made some “out-of-the-box” proposals which indicated his willingness to accept the permanence of the Line of Control, with slight readjustments. Pervez Musharraf also proposed to withdraw the dispute from the UN Security Council. All these development had neither any support by masses nor the Pakistani Foreign Office. The elected government in Pakistan which came into power in September 2008 followed the line of action of military General and addressed Kashmiri militants as “terrorists” which is unprecedented in history of Pakistan. Last year, a new issue of Mumbai attacks erupted, which is seriously hindering discussion on Kashmir. The Indian Premier has categorically refused to discuss Kashmir issue with Pakistan till the Mumbai attacks perpetrators were brought to justice and also all the terrorist camps along LoC (Line of Control) are dismantled with a view to halt all terrorism coming across from the Pak borders. On international forum, US President Barack Obama, before he was elected as US President, showed eagerness to resolve Pakistan’s dispute with India but on the contrary, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, during her recent visit to Pakistan, reiterated US policy without disturbing India. Thus the Kashmir issue is at the same place where it was on the day of partition of India and creation of Pakistan.
It is a bitter truth that since independence, Jammu & Kashmir is being indirectly ruled by Indian Intelligence Bureau (IB) which was later joined by Research and Analysis Wing (RAW). Indian government in the fog of disinformation and lies by its intelligence and so called foreign intelligence experts, made some unrealistic and undiplomatic decision that ultimately led to popular Kashmiri armed struggle against Indian brutal occupation in 1989. Indian Intelligence had been bluffing authorities at New Delhi by concealing the popular slogans on the tongue of all the Kashmiris including Kashmiri Pandits that Kashmiris do not consider themselves Indians. Side by side the government and people of India were also misguided that Kashmir is India’s ‘Atoot Ang.” Today it is exactly 20 years that Kashmiri Pandits were forced to flee the Valley in 1989 but they are not allowed to return. It is an open secret that as a state policy India is not allowing Kashmiri Pandits to return to their homes in order to prove the international community that Hindus and Muslims cannot live together, thus leading to another division of Subcontinent, this time a ‘Muslim Kashmir’ and ‘Hindu Kashmir’. If this had not been the case than why despite presence of bulk of Indian Army, Security forces and Civil administration Kashmiri Pandits and Kashmiri refugees living in Pakistan could not return to their houses in Indian side of occupied Jammu & Kashmir sate.
The plight of Kashmiris living on both sides of LoC often makes me weep. The average life span in India and Pakistan is 63 years, which means that complete generation of Kashmiris have died without enjoying their right of self-determination. Ironically, the United Nations Security Council passed resolutions for granting right of self-determination to Kashmiris in the shape of plebiscite on the very first year of Kashmir dispute in 1948 but no one has time to get them implemented. It is so cruel on the part of India, Pakistan and the world community that they failed to organize even a onetime plebiscites in Jammu and Kashmir state. The members of the International bodies including, United Nations, Human Rights organizations and so called Super Powers, have no right to move around in expensive brand new vehicles and lodge in five star hotels to give a patience hearing on Kashmiri issue. One feels very perturbed over the aggression and tyrant brutalities committed by Indian state forces in disputed Jammu and Kashmir. India is continuously refusing to obey the resolutions of UNSC on Kashmir issue but considers its rights to contest for non-permanent seat in UNSC. One wonders, if the countries which are backing India to get Non-permanent seat in the UNSC in 2011 and later a permanent seat in the same world body, would ever be able to justify their lobbying with such horrifying record of India. US President Barack Obama has won the Nobel Peace Prize for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples; isn’t it now his obligation to get United Nations resolutions on Kashmir dispute implemented so that Kashmiris can get their right of self-determination and lasting peace is restored in the region. Despite dark past record of US administration in solving issues like Kashmir and Palestine, the people of Jammu and Kashmir state are still hopeful that the President Obama is going to take personal pain in providing an opportunity to Kashmiris to express their right of self determination on the basis of UNSC Resolutions. It is the responsibility of world community to pressurize New Delhi to abide by UNSC Resolutions on Jammu and Kashmir state before any thought is given to the question of India’s inclusion in UNSC. Won’t it be a big joke that UNSC’s own non-permanent member is not ready to obey its UN’s resolutions?
Trackback URL
|
|
|
Click For More Articles By Afshain Afzal
I am a freelance writer by profession and have an experience of writing freelance for both the online and the print media. My articles regularly appear in Pakistani newspapers including The Frontier Post, Pakistan Observer, The Post, The News. In foreign press, my articles have been published in Bangladesh Today, Holiday international and Sri Lanka Guardian. Besides completing Masters in History and International Relations, I am also pursuing M Phil in Rural Development. I am a Law graduate. I spend most of the time in affairs relating to social work and writing articles.
All posts by Afshain Afzal
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.







Hi Afzal,
India is aspiring for permanent seat in US security council. By the way we in India are wary of this dialogue with a nation which doesnot honour the agreements it signs with another nation. Please read the Shimla agreement or Tashkent agreement or how your Army was preparing for Kargil when your ELECTED LEADER Nawaz Sheriff was welcoming his Indian counterpart.
You see China is holding nearly 1 trillion of US paper and we are holding just 400 billion of US paper.Your nation has to pawn your nations self respect to kerry Lugar bill for $ 8 billion. Now you see the difference.We are just shadow boxing.We are not giving kashmir at any cost .We are not giving kashmir their right of self determination which includes INDEPENDENCE which alone they want, and Permanent Five also want. Our $ 400 billion will do the talk.
Glad to see something on Kashmir otherwise looks like our government (whose foreign policy used to revolve around Kashmir) has put it in oblivion. The fact is that despite 800,000 soldiers, the highest military concentration in one area in world which makes about 1 soldier for every 8-10 kashmiris India could not silence the voice of Kashmiri freedom. Human cost is so obvious. India lies lies and then it lies some more according to Dr. Goebbles until people start believing it as truth.
India took the Kashmir dispute to UNSC and not Pakistan. I wish our forces would not retreat despite reaching Srinagar on assurances from world powers. You can see that India is not even ready to discuss it. My main concern is that add to the already huge human cost the crisis that is looming over Pakistan and that is “Water Crisis” and the picture is so bleak that I can not even dare to imagine it. Punjab’s all five rivers have their head-works in Disputed Kashmir controlled by India, it is building close to 20 small and large dams on those rivers and the days are very near when our fertile lands in Punjab will be thirsty for water if we didn’t tackle this head on. India is building a dam just recently on Jhelum river called KishanGanga dam which will divert Pakistan’s water and more dams are in the pipeline. The bottom line is the human tragedy that is unfolding and the number of people it is affecting is not limited to Kashmir itself but larger areas of Pakistan.
India should learn the lessons from USSR and history that it can not hold countries or areas that are ideologically and historically different from itself by power for long. The world’s largest democracy runs empty on tolerance when it comes to giving people the power to decide what they want. It has been hiding behind the excuse of cross border terrorism while Kashmiris rose for their own rights. Sooner or later India will realize that it’s economic growth is hampered by 800,000 soldiers needlessly holding people against their will.
The incidence on the time factor would not interest the general interest on peoples faces……..
The result 155 votes would decide the election or reelection year 2010…….
Look how desperate you pakis are!
what are all the things about India you take consolation from.
India is a respected emerging power. even a doormat will get better respect than “pakistan” in international community.